Quiz 2

Review of Quiz 2

Dramatic irony in “Rip Van Winkle”

Dramatic irony: the reader understands something about a character’s situation that the character does not yet understand.

Rip does not understand some of the things he sees, but the reader does:

Which village does the narrator like more: the old one or the new one?

There was a busy, bustling, disputatious tone about it, instead of the accustomed phlegm and drowsy tranquillity.

The old village and the new village

Prophecy in “The Story of the Hard Nut”

The horoscope says how to cure Princess Perlipat:

It’s a set of instructions, almost like a recipe.

Contrast with other prophecies like Sophocles’s Oedipus the King

Why does Princess Perlipat reject young Drosselmeier? Is this surprising?

“Away with that nasty Nutcracker!”

Genres

Fantasy and its relatives, some of which we read for today.

Older genres that feed into fantasy

Genre What it is Example
Folktale A story that people told aloud for generations. No known author. Many versions. “John Henry”
Fairy tale Folktales with magic or mythical beings, often intended for children. No exact time or place: “once upon a time.” “Hans-My-Hedgehog”
Fable Very short. Animals and other nonhuman characters speak and act like people. The moral is stated clearly. “The Tortoise and the Hare”
Legend A story connected to a real place and time but with fantastical elements. People tell it as if it might be true. King Arthur

Connections from these genres to modern fantasy

“Unauthored” tales and literary fairy tales

Frames

Fantasy frames in these stories

Why would fantasy stories need frames?

Frame narratives make the fantastic plausible

The story of Rip Van Winkle may seem incredible to many, but nevertheless I give it my full belief, for I know the vicinity of our old Dutch settlements to have been very subject to marvellous events and appearances. Indeed, I have heard many stranger stories than this, in the villages along the Hudson; all of which were too well authenticated to admit of a doubt. I have even talked with Rip Van Winkle myself, who, when last I saw him, was a very venerable old man, and so perfectly rational and consistent on every other point, that I think no conscientious person could refuse to take this into the bargain; nay, I have seen a certificate on the subject taken before a country justice, and signed with a cross, in the justice’s own handwriting. The story, therefore, is beyond the possibility of doubt. “D. K.”

Fiction vs. nonfiction

Frame narratives and truth

Shared features

What speculative fiction took from these types of stories

Which features of these stories have you seen before in modern fantasy or science fiction?

Recurring features

Feature In today’s stories In later speculative fiction
Fate The father’s wish for a child, “even if it is a hedgehog,” comes true The hero who is chosen before birth
Prophecy The horoscope and its exact rules Prophecies in Harry Potter, Dune
Magic Curses, a magic nut, a drink that causes twenty years of sleep Systems of magic with or without clear rules
Olden times Kings, princesses, courts, peasantry Fantasy worlds that look like medieval Europe (including politics)
Transformation Hans has his skin burned. Perlipat and Drosselmeier become ugly. Werewolves, mutants, people who change bodies
Human-animal hybrids Hans is half hedgehog. Aliens, monsters, cyborgs

There are rules, but the rules are not fully explained

Transformation and hybrids

Olden times and monarchy

Style

How are these stories told?

Stories for children?

Events without interiority

“The king was in a terrible fury that anybody should ever think of making a nutcracker his son-in-law…”

Some interiority

Irving gives Rip more interiority than either Hoffmann or the Grimms give their characters, but even this usually happens in dialogue. When Rip sees his son after waking up, he says,

“I’m not myself—I’m somebody else—that’s me yonder—no—that’s somebody else, got into my shoes—I was myself last night, but I fell asleep on the mountain, and they’ve changed my gun, and everything’s changed, and I’m changed, and I can’t tell what’s my name, or who I am!”

Free indirect speech

Free indirect speech is a technique used to represent interiority, where a character’s thoughts are narrated rather than spoken without explicit markers like “he said” or “he thought.” Here’s Rip’s response to seeing his son rewritten using free indirect speech:

Who was he? Heaven only knew; for he was sure he did not. He was not himself; he was somebody else. That was he, yonder, leaning against the tree. No! that was somebody else, who had got into his shoes. He had been himself last night, sure enough; but then he had fallen asleep on the mountain, and they had changed his gun, and everything was changed, and he was changed, and how, in the name of wonder, was a man to tell what his name was, or who he was? Something to this effect he stammered out to the company, being fairly at his wit’s end.

Parataxis

Now it happened that another king came this way with his servants and messengers. He too got lost and did not know the way back home because the forest was so large. He too heard the beautiful music from afar, and asked one of his messengers to go and see what it was and where it was coming from. The messenger ran to the tree where he saw Hans-My-Hedgehog astride the cock-rooster.

Hypotaxis

In that same village, and in one of these very houses (which, to tell the precise truth, was sadly time-worn and weather-beaten), there lived, many years since, while the country was yet a province of Great Britain, a simple, good-natured fellow, of the name of Rip Van Winkle.

You could rewrite this sentence paratactically like so:

At that time, that country was yet a province of Great Britain. In that country, there was a village. And in that village, there stood a house. To tell the precise truth, this house was sadly time-worn and weather-beaten. Yet in that house there lived a simple, good-natured fellow of the name of Rip Van Winkle.

How would you compare the writing styles of Hoffmann and Irving?

Comparing the writing styles of Hoffmann and Irving

Irving Hoffmann
Sentences Long, with many parts (hypotaxis) Fast, with sudden stops
Narrator Calm. He claims to be a historian. Excitable storyteller: “What a misfortune!”
Humor Gentle irony. Absurd details: seven steps, no boots, never shaved.
Word choice Formal: “disputatious,” “tranquillity” Plain, about food and bodies (especially sausages)
Mood Slow and sleepy, like Rip Comic and frightening

Who is treated unfairly in these stories?

Sexism

“Rip Van Winkle”

“The Story of the Hard Nut”

“Hans-My-Hedgehog”

Does the narrator of “Rip Van Winkle” dislike Dame Van Winkle as much as Rip does?

How do you know? Find specific evidence in the text to support your argument.

Reminders

For Tuesday


  1. Michel Foucault, “What Is an Author?” in The Foucault Reader, 1st ed, ed. Paul Rabinow (Pantheon Books, 1984).↩︎

  2. Catherine Gallagher, “The Rise of Fictionality,” in The Novel, 1st ed., vol. 1, ed. Franco Moretti (Princeton University Press, 2006).↩︎